TCM 1 990-(R) – Blanc Aero Industries – LISI – La Glèbe, La Rouquette, (FR) PQ232

QAR: Click Here
Conditions for approval required by:  Julien Gauther

3 Replies to “TCM 1 990-(R) – Blanc Aero Industries – LISI – La Glèbe, La Rouquette, (FR) PQ232”

  1. PQ174 refers to EN2910-050 nuts. Why do we have PQ174 documents in qualification 990?
    PQ262 refers to EN3013-060 nuts. Why do we have PQ262 documents in qualification 990?
    PQ266 refers to EN3912-050022 bolts. Why do we have PQ266 documents in qualification 990?

    EN3832-060018:
    FPI: 125 parts inspected instead of 200 (ISO2859-1, AQL=0,065% for this kind of defect and we have a down-arrow marked against sample size “125” for mfg bacth size from 1201 to 3200).
    CoC is dated May 2020 and we received a statement from LISI AEROSPACE that they will comply with ISO2859-1 interpretation from June 2019.
    So, could you please clarify this topic?

    EN3832-070024:
    FPI: 125 parts inspected instead of 200 (ISO2859-1, AQL=0,065% for this kind of defect and we have a down-arrow marked against sample size “125” for mfg bacth size from 1201 to 3200).
    CoC is dated May 2020 and we received a statement from LISI AEROSPACE that they will comply with ISO2859-1 interpretation from June 2019.
    So, could you please clarify this topic?

    EN3832-080034:
    FPI: 125 parts inspected instead of 200 (ISO2859-1, AQL=0,065% for this kind of defect and we have a down-arrow marked against sample size “125” for mfg bacth size from 1201 to 3200).
    CoC is dated January 2018 and we received a statement from LISI AEROSPACE that they will comply with ISO2859-1 interpretation from June 2019.
    This may be the reason why we do not have the right sample size for FPI.

    EN3832-100040:
    FPI: 80 parts inspected instead of 200 (ISO2859-1, AQL=0,065% for this kind of defect and we have a down-arrow marked against sample size “80” for mfg bacth size from 501 to 1200).
    CoC is dated July 2019 and we received a statement from LISI AEROSPACE that they will comply with ISO2859-1 interpretation from June 2019.
    So, could you please clarify this topic?

    EN4321-080016:
    FPI: 80 parts inspected instead of 200 (ISO2859-1, AQL=0,065% for this kind of defect and we have a down-arrow marked against sample size “80” for mfg bacth size from 501 to 1200).
    CoC is dated January 2012 and we received a statement from LISI AEROSPACE that they will comply with ISO2859-1 interpretation from June 2019.
    This may be the reason why we do not have the right sample size for FPI.

    EN4352-100040:
    FPI: 50 parts inspected instead of 200 (ISO2859-1, AQL=0,065% for this kind of defect and we have a down-arrow marked against sample size “50” for mfg bacth size from 281 to 500).
    CoC is dated July 2009 and we received a statement from LISI AEROSPACE that they will comply with ISO2859-1 interpretation from June 2019.
    This may be the reason why we do not have the right sample size for FPI.

    Many thanks in advance,
    Best regards,
    Julien

    1. PQ174 refers to EN2910-050 nuts. Why do we have PQ174 documents in qualification 990? => These files were not placed in the right place and do not concern the renewal of PQ232 – 990
      PQ262 refers to EN3013-060 nuts. Why do we have PQ262 documents in qualification 990? => These files were not placed in the right place and do not concern the renewal of PQ232 – 990
      PQ266 refers to EN3912-050022 bolts. Why do we have PQ266 documents in qualification 990? => These files were not placed in the right place and do not concern the renewal of PQ232 – 990
      EN3832-060018:
      => This is a writing error on the CoC, a sampling of 200 pieces was indeed carried out on this lot and specified on the logbook.
      EN3832-070024:
      => This is a writing error on the CoC, a sampling of 200 pieces was indeed carried out on this lot and specified on the logbook.
      EN3832-080034:. => Yes, the CND operation and the certificate of conformity were issued before the interpretation of ISO2859 was taken into account.
      EN3832-100040:
      => This batch was finished after June 2019 but the FPI operation was carried out before the rule was taken into account.
      EN4321-080016:
      => Yes, the CND operation and the certificate of conformity were issued before the interpretation of ISO2859 was taken into account.
      EN4352-100040:
      => Yes, the CND operation and the certificate of conformity were issued before the interpretation of ISO2859 was taken into account.

  2. Many thanks for these answers which are satisfying.
    Approved on my side.
    Best regards.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Form restricted to registered, logged in users. Please return to the home page and use the Create Account option.